Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '21 at 07:17
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core 7,120 User benchmarks, average bench 67% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 174 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 336 38% 295 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 76.8 46% 65.1 fps	MRender 59.9 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 44 44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JD 240GB 240GB 1,802 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 15 18 18 47 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 439 Write 352 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 51.6 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 0.4 33% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 49.3 DQ Write 19.7 DQ Mixed 0.6 9% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 115%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 167GB free Firmware: 1AC01114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 88 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 95 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 92.7 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$35 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 21.7 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 41: 3R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
41%	31%	49	110	8	60	21.5"	1280 720	VSC0F30 VA2261

History: Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 36: 4R 4G 4B | Score 41: 3R 7G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	853x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	811x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $75Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	770x

GPU
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	806x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	461x
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	433x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	362x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	192x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	175x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	270x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	199x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	154x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $425

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400