Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 111
53% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 367
30% 264 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.9% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 65.7
55% 68.4 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 65.9
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 139 143 143 141 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 287
Write 186
Mixed 222
SusWrite 139
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 24.1
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 168
132% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2000 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 21.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 13% 53 315 239 60 0" 1280 800 OTM0750 Optoma WXGA
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $857
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback