Intel NUC5CPYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ NUC5CPYB
MotherboardIntel NUC5CPYB  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 48.6
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 42.1
26% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 42.1
6% 41.9 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2060) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4235
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.5
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 75 44 45 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 411
Write 173
Mixed 218
SusWrite 65.5
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 19.5
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 95.2
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 34.7
39% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 88%
JMicron Generic 240GB
110GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 219 208 210 135 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 129
Write 239
Mixed 167
SusWrite 195
263% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 18.5
1,458% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 26.1
2,174% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 134%
Great: 268%
ASMT USB 3.0 Destop H 2TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 35 20 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Read 2.3
Write 3.3
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 18.7
12% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC5CPYB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC5CPYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback