MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 422
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
MSI(1462 112D) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 43.4
31% 41.9 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 35.8
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 112D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 5.8
3% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
19GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 447
Mixed 387
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 39.5
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.1
Write 69.5
Mixed 21.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
HzW RAID 0 (Striping) 4.5TB
38GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 227 225 224 222 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.7% Excellent
Read 202
Write 218
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 224
250% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 84%
Samsung D3 Station 5TB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 65 54 52 45 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46% Average
Read 82.9
Write 60.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 53.8
73% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.4
261% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46%
Great: 84%
Samsung D3 Station 5TB
93GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 73 72 69 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46% Average
Read 70.8
Write 68
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 69.6
97% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1
263% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46%
Great: 84%
Samsung D3 Station 6TB
31GB free, PID 6126
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 81 83 83 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
Read 85.1
Write 74.7
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 79.7
93% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 0420 AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 9905428-417.A00LF 9905428-417.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 1R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 11% 65 276 195 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0CCF U24E850
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 15: 1R 2G 4B
Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback