Lenovo 20UVS0Q000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20UVS0Q000  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20UVS0Q000
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 08:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1140G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 38.9
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 111
39% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 272
28% 227 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 508B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 21.9
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G-1001 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21160001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 895
Write 588
Mixed 708
162% 730 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 27.4
91% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 214
137% 158 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNFBMBLPR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 34.9
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 12.2" 1280 720 LEN4190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback