Today's hottest deals

Medion M14L-256

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedion M14L-256  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40IL6
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 17:04
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 152
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 314
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E39 A030) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 7.4
6% 6.37 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NSN025SA356-Y01Q2R0 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 266 225 203 207 205 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 399
Write 341
Mixed 296
SusWrite 226
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 13.2
68% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 41.2
85% 168 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 77%
VendorCo Disk 67GB
57GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.9 4.1 3.5 0.6 6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 16
Write 1.7
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 3.1
9% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.3
149% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H2666GSC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 2% 66 81 50 60 14" 1366 768 STA0450 XR140EA1T
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B
Typical M14L-256 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion M14L-256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback