Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 64.1
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 134
54% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 546
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 110
Parallax 114
94% 113 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 94.1
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 483 160 615 545 545 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 834
Write 798
Mixed 118
SusWrite 460
123% 552 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 12.8
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 78.2
59% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback