NCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx  (all builds)
MotherboardNCR Pocono
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 13:57
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 339
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 21.7
18% 21 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 24
Splatting 17.4
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 180 74 51 86 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 115
Write 64.8
Mixed 189
SusWrite 91.8
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 27.1
91% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 37.4
31% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
42GB free
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 188 36 54 30 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 374
Write 299
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 91.7
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 6.8
44% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 7.9
9% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 85%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
30GB free, PID 0cc4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8 0.1 7 3.3 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 19.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 5.7
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
140% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 85F7 F6456U64F9333G 85F7 F6456U64F9333G 85F7 F6456U64F9333G 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 25% 8 110 6 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
History:
Typical xxxx-xxxx-xxxx Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: NCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback