ECS MCP61M-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS MCP61M-M3  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 01:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 68.6
45% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 83.8
8-Core 83.7
11% 83.8 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(7377 0000) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 375 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 2.5
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.9
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 45 44 46 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 57
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 41.9
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 59%
HGST HTS 725032A7E630 320GB
59GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 24.5
33% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback