Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 00:33
Run Duration568 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 519
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3692) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 41.6
40% 45.5 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 37
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 488
Write 68.8
Mixed 91.1
46% 216 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 4.23
34% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 6.34
18% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
166GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 105
Write 93.5
Mixed 34.6
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
140GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 61.3
Mixed 39.8
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.35
97% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
I-O DATA HDC-U 250GB
175GB free, PID 010f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 29.6
Mixed 23.7
37% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.41
66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Generic External 320GB
162GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 42.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 14.5
35% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.34
76% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HTS541612J9AT00 120GB
49GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 31.4
Mixed 2.95
25% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%
FUJITSU MHS2060AT 60GB
48GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 22.6
Mixed 16.5
26% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.22
47% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 12%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
27GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 21
Write 4.54
Mixed 7.19
11% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.83
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.002
18% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback