Asus GL703VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus GL703VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VM
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 207
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 572
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 156E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 66
47% 64.3 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 61
Splatting 62.3
52% 63 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 550 547 540 532 525 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 1,101
Mixed 520
SusWrite 572
184% 821 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 48.4
185% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 645
505% 704 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 168%
Great: 254%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
549GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 101 101 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 97.7
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 65%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
789GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 903 501 498 499 494 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 6,896
Write 5,800
Mixed 6,262
SusWrite 560
3,672% 4,880 MB/s
4K Read 591
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 268
58,292% 357 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 721
6,989% 806 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Seagate USB 1TB
637GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 80 77 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 105
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 78.1
119% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 148%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
87GB free, PID 0723
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 16 16 17 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 17.7
Write 10
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 15.9
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.2
314% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VM Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL703VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback