| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H410M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210114 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '21 at 10:25 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
75% 135 Pts
|
63% 520 Pts
|
56% 897 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
27% 23.2 fps
|
25% 31.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 353 138 6.4 6.3 37 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
64% 283 MB/s
|
101% 36.3 MB/s
|
172% 254 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BL8G26C16U4B.8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
31%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
19% 6.73 GB/s
|
41% 98.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H410M-K Builds (Compare 2,863 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,169x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 617x |
| Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 274x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 333x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 249x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 228x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $365 |