MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C67
MotherboardMSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 625
69% 547 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 98.8
82% 98.7 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 0.3
50% 71 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 111 104 121 104 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 418
Write 232
Mixed 159
SusWrite 119
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 30.9
128% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 132
136% 225 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
296GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 138 133 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 80.4
Write 122
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 130
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 106%
ST332082 0A 320GB
226GB free, PID 0274
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 19
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 34.1
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
WD My Book 25DA 2TB
24GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 123 123 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49% Average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 122
143% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67) Builds (Compare 3,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback