Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 04:08
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 69
2-Core 138
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 605
56% 466 Pts
64-Core 1,547
96% 1,547 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.1
15% 19 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.4
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR512GB-3DL 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 400 411 404 409 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 423
Write 404
Mixed 382
SusWrite 404
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26.6
92% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 258
196% 262 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 115%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 2.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1183 1197 1186 1185 1176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
205% Outstanding
Read 1,632
Write 1,825
Mixed 1,792
SusWrite 1,185
363% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 60.5
182% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 212
162% 219 MB/s
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
855GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 925 903 908 908 895 906 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,175
Write 1,011
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 907
233% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 48
154% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 504
368% 483 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 172%
Great: 477%
LSI MR9260-8i 2.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 1257 1270 1268 1275 1263 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 28.3
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
4.5TB free, PID ab62
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 129 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 48.2
Write 90.6
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 128
120% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
4.5TB free, PID ab62
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 130 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 103
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 125
129% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
4.5TB free, PID ab5c
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 131 135 136 133 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 102
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 130
130% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CH9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 28.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback