Today's hottest deals

HP s5-1240d

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP s5-1240d  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 19:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 188
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 362
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Sapphire(174B 0620) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 60 44 15 34 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 89.9
Write 43.2
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 40.3
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical s5-1240d Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP s5-1240d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback