Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory42.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '17 at 00:31
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$211
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 250
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 876
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,250
77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 202
Parallax 175
146% 186 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 171
Splatting 124
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_1 8TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Read 400
Write 499
Mixed 258
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 3.94
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1.3
13% 5.41 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 1.88
5% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
HPT DISK 0_2 20TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
Read 340
Write 381
Mixed 259
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 2.02
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.75
9% 4.02 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.18
4% 7.56 MB/s
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,685
Write 1,354
Mixed 1,640
417% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 33.7
157% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42.5
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 80.6
62% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 241%
Great: 331%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
435GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,695
Write 1,342
Mixed 1,712
422% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 33.7
135% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 88.4
102% 179 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 241%
Great: 155%
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
435GB free
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,740
Write 2,343
Mixed 2,746
583% 2,610 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.5
173% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 125
130% 216 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 318%
Great: 172%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
435GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,758
Write 2,336
Mixed 2,880
594% 2,658 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.2
172% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 126
131% 216 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 318%
Great: 283%
Samsung MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GB
435GB free
Firmware: 7L0QBXX7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,751
Write 2,321
Mixed 2,565
568% 2,546 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.6
174% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 126
132% 218 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 317%
Great: 260%
HPT DISK 0_0 20TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR CL16-16-16 D4-2400 BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR CL16-16-16 D4-2400 BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR CL16-16-16 D4-2400 48GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 34.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 22.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback