Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 21:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 701
76% 603 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 59.9 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 105 132 93 90 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD20EZAZ-00G 2TB
811GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 126 117 131 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 335
Write 124
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 129
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.6
8% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 1
2% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback