Today's hottest deals

Intel S5520SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S5520SC  (all builds)
Memory92.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 21:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 133
56% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 408
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 81
Parallax 72.5
56% 74.2 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 63.8
57% 70 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 PCIe 240GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 163 168 168 171 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 360
Write 187
Mixed 201
SusWrite 165
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 21.3
72% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 190
160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 89%
Intel MegaSR 2TB
405GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 212 209 212 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 193
Mixed 115
SusWrite 204
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.5
346% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5520SC Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5520SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback