Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 306 43% 319 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 143371659 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1371 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 181778720 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12728 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1366 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 21 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 51 656212007 (C2) HDA temperature 39 49 73014444071 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 41 143371659 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 77661598662586 (F1) Unknown 100 253 303053584 (F2) Unknown 100 253 644716101	50% Average	Read 85.2 Write 88.7 Mixed 88 66% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.45 113% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	62x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x

RAM
99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 11 samples	9x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	4x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278