Packard IMEDIA X4402 NC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard IMEDIA X4402 NC  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FMCP7AM
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 12:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 65.4
30% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 130
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130
Sapphire(174B 9450) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 1.5
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 15 13 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 39.4
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 20.4
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 51%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB
510GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 29.4
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 12.6
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 61%
WD My Book 1TB
44GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 28.6
Mixed 26
SusWrite 12.6
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 2TB
17GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 30.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 1.4
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 802GB
96GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 30.3
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 11.1
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IMEDIA X4402 NC Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Packard IMEDIA X4402 NC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback