Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190227
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 11:40
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 680-$300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 158
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 221
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 360GB 360GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200916
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 228 232 231 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 253
Write 236
Mixed 223
SusWrite 230
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 12.1
75% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 18.1
55% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HCS725050VLA380 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: V56OA7HA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 64 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 63.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 62.5
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
785GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback