Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20BHS0CU09

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20BHS0CU09  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BHS0CU09
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 444
51% 396 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 11.5
7% 9.93 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 9.3
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TDL-1AW1ZABHA 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 366 365 360 362 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 364
Write 376
Mixed 255
SusWrite 365
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 15.5
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 247
200% 281 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 116%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 37.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 13.6
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback