Hp-pavilion KX745AV-ABA m9600t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion KX745AV-ABA m9600t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 492
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 76.7
58% 74.6 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 72
Splatting 69.4
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 720GB
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 42 44 35 32 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 265
Write 80.2
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 40.6
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 12.2
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 53.9
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 22.9
25% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 176%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
129GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 65 15 7.7 85 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 1,159
Write 788
Mixed 748
SusWrite 102
155% 699 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 25
92% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 102
86% 132 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 209%
hp v221w 8GB
8GB free, PID f807
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4.9 4.8 4.8 5.4 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.6
7% 5.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 7%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.3 7 7.6 5.8 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Read 35.2
Write 5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 6
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 85%
583 1TB
606GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 96 115 98 114 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.1% Outstanding
Read 58.7
Write 118
Mixed 116
SusWrite 109
148% 100 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 16.1
1,206% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 6.8
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 7
1,597% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KX745AV-ABA m9600t Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KX745AV-ABA m9600t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback