Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 13 '15 at 17:15
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 176
61% 134 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 504
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Zotac(19DA 1209) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3788
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 20.3
18% 23 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 24
Splatting 25.6
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G3LC763C121S443 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 261
Write 195
Mixed 189
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 17.8
84% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.5
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 46.2
59% 102 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 75%
1TB Mirror 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
Read 134
Write 107
Mixed 110
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.67
151% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
2TB Mirror 2TB
528GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 125
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.43
105% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
ASMT 2105 60GB
3GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 111
Write 47.9
Mixed 63.4
84% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 7.87
1,554% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 7.45
1,857% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback