Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory12.7 GB free of 15 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 141
55% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 165
27% 193 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB
Nvidia(10DE 118F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 357 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 461.33
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 128
Reflection 110
Parallax 130
104% 123 fps
MRender 55.1
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 99.1
59% 68.7 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 275GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 41 23 42 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48% Average
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 117
SusWrite 59.3
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 2.5
419% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 28.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback