Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 19:20
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 728
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB; founders edition
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)
98% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
98% 120 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 120
Splatting 120
98% 120 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 98%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS200T1XHE-00AFY0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1741 2187 2253 2299 2318 1112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,330
Write 2,005
Mixed 2,028
SusWrite 1985
470% 2,087 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 65.5
219% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 388
288% 386 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 300%
Great: 608%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 212 207 199 200 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 184
Write 175
Mixed 157
SusWrite 206
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.5
29% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 5.6
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 38%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
477GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 1429 1430 1434 1434 1427 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 1,406
Mixed 983
SusWrite 1,425
321% 1,435 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 48.6
154% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 367
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 229%
Great: 283%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 145 151 151 150 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$124
2TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 125 124 123 123 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 47
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 21.6
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback