Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 17:25
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$210
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 738
72% 593 Pts
64-Core 1,151
71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 39.7
32% 40.4 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 28.2
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 345 297 283 269 269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1058
Mixed 965
SusWrite 368
212% 953 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64.9
235% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 321
366% 623 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 186%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 185 186 186 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 184
Mixed 111
SusWrite 185
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
226GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 21 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.6
Mixed 23
SusWrite 21.8
33% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA8M-26N1900 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 1,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback