Today's hottest deals

EVGA X58 SLI Classified

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardEVGA X58 SLI Classified  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 08:06
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 137
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 348
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 64.8
41% 51.1 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 53
Splatting 26.6
30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 62 78 86 86 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 223
Write 174
Mixed 148
SusWrite 77.2
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 18.8
66% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 22.1
19% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
423GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 41 49 59 60 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 35.4
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 53.9
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
380GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 41 50 61 64 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 54.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 55.2
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
544GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 87 87 87 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 86.9
Write 85.7
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 85.8
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 60%
ASMT 2115 2TB
126GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 62 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 64.2
Write 61.9
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 61
80% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 111%
WD Elements 2TB
70GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 18.9
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 19.7
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
Inateck 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 20.9
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 20.7
29% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 SLI Classified Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA X58 SLI Classified

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback