Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory90.8 GB free of 95.9971 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 01:12
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 646
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 53.2
34% 39.4 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 21.5
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW8SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1290
Write 1,190
Mixed 796
243% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 44.7
150% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 401
295% 388 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x 3x31.7GB
3 of 4 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback