MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 299
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,127
103% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 126
104% 131 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 970 512GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 110 109 110 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 594
Write 526
Mixed 527
SusWrite 115
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 5.3
17% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 326%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: P3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 111 110 112 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 627
Write 645
Mixed 503
SusWrite 116
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 24.9
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 168
204% 339 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 225%
Amd-raid OCZ-VERTEX3 120GB
40GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 106 102 101 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 310
Write 150
Mixed 192
SusWrite 102
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 7
22% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 66.1
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 65
61% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 56%
Amd-raid Array 3 3TB
440GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 112 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 113
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback