Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 157
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 432
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
MSI(1462 2572) 1.2GB
CLim: 552 MHz, MLim: 802 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 17.1
12% 19.3 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 17.1
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 340 317 314 316 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 479
Write 458
Mixed 385
SusWrite 330
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 36.4
116% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 316
235% 313 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
511GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 98 93 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 96.1
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 94.5
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
454GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 16.6
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 19.8
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Samsung STORY Station 2TB
745GB free, PID 5f07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 18 16 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 21.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 16.5
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback