HP h8-1214

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1214  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120405
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 113
54% 86 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 243
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
PNY(196E 0F02) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.7
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 93 98 96 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 115
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 89.1
72% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 79%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 116 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 117
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99924-15- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1214 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback