Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 586
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 70.3
60% 73.8 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 69.6
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.03 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 406
Mixed 54.7
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 24.1
123% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 129
121% 192 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: 32A0T2IA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1096 949 957 782 118 1096 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 937
Mixed 191
SusWrite 833
216% 983 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 39
129% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 199
180% 289 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 185%
Great: 373%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
396GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 167
Write 151
Mixed 100
SusWrite 116
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
109GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 119
Write 133
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 112%
ROG ESD-S1C 2TB
889GB free, PID 1932
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 600 598 565 593 590 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 582
Mixed 472
SusWrite 586
742% 534 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 43.9
3,546% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 43.2
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 49.3
4,330% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 382%
Great: 382%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
7GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 41.9
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3007, 3007, 3007, 3007 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 24
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback