Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 180
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 646
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 1,658
103% 1,658 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 19.5
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.6
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 134 143 139 145 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 269
Write 240
Mixed 222
SusWrite 145
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 24.4
79% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 99.4
89% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 89%
Liteonit LCT-512L9S-11 2.5 7mm 512GB
446GB free
Firmware: 10B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 328 340 351 320 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 420
Write 335
Mixed 262
SusWrite 340
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 21.8
80% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 213
175% 255 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 199 203 202 201 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 3 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Read 9
Write 5.7
Mixed 9.4
SusWrite 2.8
9% 6.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 14%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
982GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 19.7
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 22.3
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
53% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NG0NL-CG 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 29
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback