Medion MD34285

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion MD34285 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B460H6-EM
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200519
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	May 10 '21 at 08:30
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700-$229 71,010 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 149 2-Core 297 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,033 98% 811 Pts	64-Core 1,583 98% 1,583 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Zotac(19DA 9520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.80 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 112 Parallax 126 100% 120 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 112 Splatting 101 103% 131 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,444 Write 2,276 Mixed 1,568 397% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 78.5 274% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,011 DQ Write 927 DQ Mixed 1,018 750% 985 MB/s
Poor: 174% Great: 263%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3GB free Firmware: U21010RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 393 Mixed 235 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 18.6 118% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 107 120% 199 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 15 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 36.6 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 15.1 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.6 199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 219GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 14 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 35.9 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 14.9 21% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 181% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 87%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1TB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 349GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.7 7.8 6.8 6 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 38.4 Write 39 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 6.9 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 20%
H/W DISK 3 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 5GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.3 6.7 5.9 5.1 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 29.6 Mixed 33 SusWrite 5.8 33% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 50%
H/W DISK 4 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 29GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 41.1 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 0.7 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 9,655 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.5% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 14.7 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 13.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34285 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Medion MD34285

CPU
Core i7-10700Intel $229Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	8x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	8x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 1TBBench 233%, 394 samples	6x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
IM2P33F8-256GD1 256GBNvmeBench 122%, 20 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples	6x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 86%, 13,446 samples	2x
BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 1,824 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $739

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion MD34285

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion MD34285

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)