Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 24412Z4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 24412Z4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24412Z4
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 433
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.91
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 165 39 40 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 444
Write 434
Mixed 346
SusWrite 125
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 37
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 249
219% 328 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 126%
External USB3.0 250GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 17.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 19.5
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 6.2
1,062% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback