Asus Q500A

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus Q500A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q500A
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120921
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	May 06 '21 at 13:04
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 127 58% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 390 41% 328 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 107B) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 2.8 2% 3.27 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5.5 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 287 297 291 289 292 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 453 Write 371 Mixed 384 SusWrite 293 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 28.9 101% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 127 113% 173 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 128%
WD My Passport 1TB 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 273GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 56 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 73.3 Write 73.8 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 56.1 82% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 308GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 76 75 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 75.8 Write 76.5 Mixed 46 SusWrite 75 92% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 13.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q500A Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q500A

CPU
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples	27x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	26x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	20x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	74x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
T253512GB 512GBTeamBench 82%, 3,987 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	11x
M471B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GBSamsungBench 41%, 672 samples	10x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16