Lenovo 20332

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20332  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO AIUU1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 14:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3520
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 37.9
26% 37 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 82.6
8% 67 Pts
64-Core 89.7
6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3985) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 144 55 52 55 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.5% Very poor
Read 228
Write 206
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 93.1
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 92%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
30GB free, PID 1f00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 10.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 12.9
15% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4MT425664FZ61-49 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20332 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20332

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback