Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 19:48
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 128
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 281
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 13.1
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13.1
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.1% Poor
Read 211
Write 90.3
Mixed 144
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 0.04
20% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 12
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 3.35
13% 27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
112GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 58.4
Mixed 65.8
48% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.34
75% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
ST1500DM 003-9YN16G 1.5TB
817GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 29.8
38% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.33
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback