Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FL
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 20:43
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	80%
CPU Throttled	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 36.7 2-Core 56.5 35% 51.1 Pts	4-Core 83.5 8-Core 94.8 12% 89.2 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 11BF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 6.5 4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB 2,813 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 40 89 52 84 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 251 Write 210 Mixed 202 SusWrite 90 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 13.8 51% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 197 168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 79%
StoreJet 1TB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 773GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 38 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 8.4 Write 35.2 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 36.8 19% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.5 135% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GB 486 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	33x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	32x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	46x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	22x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	15x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	29x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	10x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 486 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16