Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 02:47
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 291 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1042 98% 811 Pts	64-Core 1,510 93% 1,510 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 7.6 5% 7.3 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.2 7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2281) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 162 Parallax 185 136% 171 fps	MRender 200 Gravity 167 Splatting 131 132% 166 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 364 294 125 138 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 440 Mixed 387 SusWrite 247 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 44 148% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 123 155% 276 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 160GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 119 116 118 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 118 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 116 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GB 556 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.3% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 21.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 20.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	521x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	514x
RTX 2060Nvidia $269Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	452x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	363x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	266x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	282x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	243x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	186x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $891