Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 12:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600-$139
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 182
2-Core 365
113% 213 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,018
100% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1456 1467 1520 1494 1121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,574
Mixed 1,305
SusWrite 1,420
314% 1,386 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 99.1
347% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,595
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1,206
978% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 310%
Great: 295%
Intenso Ultra Line 16GB
10GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 4.9 13 18 7.1 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 7.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 8.2
10% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 28.7
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 36.3
108% 37.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback