Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 60 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 71.4 38% 57.9 Pts	4-Core 96.8 8-Core 116 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 51%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3SMD2HTGT240GB 240GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0815B SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 347 345 356 348 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 408 Write 332 Mixed 259 SusWrite 342 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 29.9 77% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 78.7 57% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 10.3 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	1x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GBHynixBench 29%, 338 samples	4x
16JTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GBMicronBench 45%, 12 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,529 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16