Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 73
39% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 195
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 4.8
5% 4.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 172 262 175 176 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 921
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 195
191% 857 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63
221% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 652
493% 666 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 159%
Great: 179%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
802GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 139 140 138 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 137
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback