Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 08:03
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 632
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 58
Parallax 3.3
2% 21.4 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 1TB
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 1269 1110 1134 609 614 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 1,344
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 957
254% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 42.2
140% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 593
448% 608 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 175%
Great: 234%
Intenso Premium Line 64GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 9.3 9.6 18 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 8
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 12.3
21% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
79% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 28%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
6GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 27 30 15 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 98.7
Write 39.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 26
60% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
102% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback