Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 167 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 633 56% 474 Pts	64-Core 1,519 94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 048D) CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 36 Parallax 41.9 27% 37 fps	MRender 30.3 Gravity 31 Splatting 24.4 23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ48 480GB 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 208 220 201 189 183 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 225 Write 214 Mixed 208 SusWrite 203 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 25.9 84% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 141 109% 151 MB/s

Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8GB free Firmware: 5B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 228 Write 212 Mixed 216 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 22.9 85% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 71.3 72% 116 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 169 174 174 169 170 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 106 Write 113 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 167 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0... 144GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 33.5 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	92x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	76x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	75x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	33x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16