Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro3,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 12:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5482
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 46
2-Core 91.7
44% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 361
32% 272 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3537) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.1
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-256M3S 2.5 7mm 256GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VRDC
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,825
Write 30.9
Mixed 61.2
133% 639 MB/s
4K Read 241
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.4
372% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 94%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
397GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 64 63 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 60.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 63.5
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 500GB
263GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 23.1
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 23.9
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.6
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback