Asus X455LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X455LF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X455LF
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 06:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 145
50% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 214
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A7D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 6.1
3% 6.37 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen01sm21ar256sdk 256GB 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 313 344 319 329 330 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 382
Write 329
Mixed 329
SusWrite 324
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 14.8
69% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 51.3
99% 194 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
632GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 72
Write 79.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 81.9
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 Kingston 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X455LF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X455LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback