Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$148
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 999
94% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,444
89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$470
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 210
Parallax 218
177% 215 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
132% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 182
Mixed 264
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 39.9
150% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 160
131% 187 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 90%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 980 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: 1B4Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 558 538 598 701 561 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 550
Write 517
Mixed 505
SusWrite 589
122% 540 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 16.2
42% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 801
611% 811 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 396%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback