HP Desktop Pro A MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Desktop Pro A MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8434
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 193
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 611
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 405 244 25 193 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 274
Write 8.7
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 216
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 3.4
32% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 102%
Sony Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 12.9
Mixed 7
SusWrite 13.2
18% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.1
12% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.1
166% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BBOS MSD416G26Q3 20GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Pro A MT Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop Pro A MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback